Do you think OBAMA & PELOSI specifically chose a stimulus strategy that won't create more jobs to push agenda?

Do you think OBAMA & PELOSI specifically chose not to deliver stimulus immediately to the parts of the economy most likely to pay more revenue to government in future years after the economy grows back.

Generally most Presidents choose to cut tax rates during a recession because it definitively delivers stimulus dollars to the economy that is proportional to the most likely growth of revenue(i.e. whomever pays tax revenues to the government today is most likely to pay more revenue in the future).

Obama instead followed Pelosi’s leadership and chose to follow Jimmy Carter’s failed stimulus plan which historically will not increase employment.

Do you believe that OBAMA & PELOSI may have chosen this jobless path on purpose in order to help generate support for a more radical entitlement-based reform of healthcare?

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Do you think OBAMA & PELOSI specifically chose a stimulus strategy that won't create more jobs to push agenda?”

  1. wisdomforfools says:

    Yes, although I believe the agenda is to destroy the middle class And bust Unions. The powers that be want to drive out jobs until the American worker is so desperate they will agree to work for far less than a living wadge. Regan started this, Clinton signed NAFTA and Bush helped to insure the Banks would reap the benefits of the economic collapse. Obama is continuing in this vein by catering to Wall Street and doing nothing to help create jobs or save middle class people in foreclosure.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.